What’s this thing about?
This post has a few main points:
1. Speeding up a filesystem’s performance by setting it up on a tuned RAID0/5 array.
2. Picking the fastest filesystem.
3. The fastest format options for Ext3/4 or XFS filesystems.
4. Tuning an Ext3/4 filesystem’s journal and directory index for speed.
5. Filesystem mount options that increase performance, such as noatime and barrier=0.
6. Setting up LILO to boot from a RAID1 /boot partition.
The title is a bit of an oversimplification 😉 The article is intended to keep being work in progress as “we” learn, and as new faster tools become available. This article is not intended to cover the fastest hardware (yet). The goal is the “fastest” filesystem possible on whatever device you have. Basically, “we” want to setup and tweak whatever is possible to get our IO writes and reads to happen quicker. Which IO reads? random or sequential? long or short? The primary goal is a quick Linux root filesystem, which is slightly different than, lets say, a database-only filesystem, or a /home partition for user files. Oh, and by the way, do not use this on your production machines, people. Seriously.
WTF is RAID?!
The first question is, how many devices would you like your filesystem to span? The simple and correct answer is – the more the faster. To use one filesystem across multiple devices, a single “virtual” device can be created from multiple partitions with RAID. (Recently developed filesystems, like BTRFS and ZFS, are capable of splitting themselves intelligently across partitions to optimize performance on their own, without RAID) Linux uses a software RAID tool which comes free with every major distribution – mdadm. Read about mdadm here, and read about using it here. There’s also a quick 10 step guide I wrote here which will give you an idea about the general procedure of setting up a RAID mdadm array.
Plan your array, and then think about it for a while before you execute – you can’t change the array’s geometry (which is the performance sensitive part) after it’s created, and it’s a real pain to migrate a filesystem between arrays. Not to mention a Linux root filesystems.
Deciding on a performance oriented type of RAID ( RAID0 vs. RAID5 )
The rule of thumb is to use 3 or more drives in a RAID5 array to gain redundancy at the cost of a slight performance loss over a RAID0 array (10% CPU load at peak times on my 2.8 GHz AthlonX2 with a 3 disk RAID5 array). If you only have 2 drives, you cannot use RAID5. Whatever your situation is, RAID0 will always be the fastest, but less responsible, choice.
RAID0 provides no redundancy and will fail irrecoverably when one of the drives in the array fails. Some would say you should avoid putting your root filesystem on an un-redundant array, but we’ll do it anyways! RAID0 is, well, the *fastest* (I threw that caution to the wind and I’m typing this from a RAID0 root partition, for what it’s worth). If you are going to be or have been using a RAID0 array, please comment about your experiences. Oh, and do backup often. At least weekly. To an *external* drive. If you only have one drive you can skip to the filesystem tuning part. If you do are going to use RAID0/5, remember to leave room for a RAID1 array, or a regular partition, for /boot. Today, LILO cannot yet boot a RAID0/5 array.
Deciding on a RAID stripe size ( 4 / 8 / 16 / 32 / 64 / 128 / 256 … )
You will need to decide, for both RAID0 and RAID5, about the size of the stripe you will use. See how such decisions affect performance here. I find the best results for my personal desktop to be 32kb chunks. 64 does not feel much different. I would not recommend going below 32 or above 128 for a general desktops root partition. I surf, play games, stream UPnP, run virtual machines, and use a small MySQL database. If I would be doing video editing, for example, a significantly bigger stripe size would be faster. Such specific usage filesystem should be setup for their own need and not on the root filesystem, if possible. Comments?
RAID 5 – deciding on a parity algorithm ( Symmetric vs. Asymmetric )
For RAID5, the parity algorithm can be set to 4 different types. Symmetric-Left, Symmetric-Right, Asymmetric-Left, and Asymmetric-Right. They are explained here, but they appear to only affect performance to a small degree for desktop usage, as one thread summarized.
Creating a RAID0 array
Using the suggestions above, the command to create a 2-disk RAID0 array for a root partition on /dev/md0 using the partitions /dev/sda1 and /dev/sdb1 should look like this:
# mdadm --create /dev/md0 --metadata=0.90 --level=0 --chunk=32 --raid-devices=2 /dev/sd[ab]1
Note the –metadata option, which with 0.90 specifies the older mdadm metadata format. If you will use anything other than 0.90, you will find Lilo failing to boot.
The Fastest Filesystem – Setup and Tuning
Deciding on a Filesystem ( Ext3 vs. Ext4 vs. XFS vs. BTRFS )
The Ext4 filesystem does seem to outperform Ext3, XFS and BTRFS, and it can be optimized for striping on RAID arrays. I recommend Ext4 until BTRFS catches up in performance, becomes compatible with LILO/GRUB, and gets an FSCK tool.
Deciding on a Filesystem Block Size ( 1 vs. 2 vs. 4 )
It is impossible to stress how important this part is. Luckily, if you don’t know what this is and just don’t touch it, most mkfs tools default to the fastest choice – 4kb. Why you would not want to use 1 or 2 is neatly shown in the benchmarking results of RAID performance on those block sizes. Even if you are not using RAID, you will find 4kb blocks to perform faster. Much like the RAID geometry, this is permanent and cannot be changed.
Creating an optimized for RAID Ext4 ( stride and stripe-width )
Use those guidelines to calculate these values:
stride = filesystem block-size / RAID chunk.
stripe-width = stride * number of drives in RAID array ( - for RAID0, and that minus one for RAID5 )
pass the stride and the stripe-width to mkfs.ext4, along with the block size in bytes, like this:
# mkfs.ext4 -b 4096 -E stride=8,stripe-width=16 /dev/md0
A handy tool to calculate those things for you can be found here.
Creating an optimized XFS filesystem ( sunit and swidth )
The XFS options for RAID optimization are sunit and swidth. A good explanation about those two options can be found in this post. A quick and dirty formula to calculate those parameters was taken from here:
sunit = RAID chunk in bytes / 512
swidth = sunit * number of drives in RAID array ( - for RAID0, and that minus one for RAID5 )
The sunit for a 32kb (or 32768 byte) array would be 32768 / 512 = 64
The command to create such a filesystem for a 32kb chunk size RAID0 array with 2 drives and a 4096 (4kb) block size will look something like this:
# mkfs.xfs -b size=4096 -d sunit=64,swidth=128 /dev/md0
Tuning the Ext3 / Ext4 Filesystem ( Journal )
There’s a good explanation about the 3 modes in which a filesystem’s journal can be used on the OpenSUSE Wiki. That same guide will rightly recommend avoiding writing actual data to the journal to improve performance. On a newly created but unmounted filesystem, disable the writing of actual data to the journal:
# tune2fs -O has_journal -o journal_data_writeback /dev/md0
Turning on Ext3 / Ext4 Directory Indexing:
Your filesystem will perform faster if the directories are indexed:
# tune2fs -O dir_index /dev/md0
# e2fsck -D /dev/md0
Filesystem Mounting Options ( noatime, nodiratime, barrier, data and errors options ):
Some options should be passed to the filesystem on mount to increase its performance:
noatime, nodiratime – Do not log access of files and directories.
barrier=0 – Disable barrier sync (Only safe if you can assure uninterrupted power to the drives, such as a UPS battery)
errors=remount-ro – When we have filesystem errors, we should remount our root filesystem readonly (and generally panic).
data=writeback – For Ext3 / Ext4. If your journal is in writeback mode (as we previously advised), set this option.
My fstab looks like this:
/dev/md0 / ext4 noatime,nodiratime,data=writeback,stripe=16,barrier=0,errors=remount-ro 1 1
And my manual mount command will look like this:
# mount /dev/md0 /mnt -o noatime,nodiratime,data=writeback,stripe=16,barrier=0,errors=remount-ro
Did I mention to NEVER do this on a production machine?
Installing your Linux
Install as usual, but do not format the root partition you’ve setup! If you are using RAID0/5, you have to setup a separate, RAID1 or primary /boot partition. In my experience, the leaving the boot partition unoptimized does not affect regular performance, but if you are keen on shaving a few milliseconds off your boot-time you can go ahead and tune that filesystem yourself as well.
Making sure LILO boots
If you are using RAID0/5 for your root partition, you must setup a separate non-RAID or RAID1 partition as /boot. If you do setup your /boot partition to be on a RAID1 array, you have to make sure to point lilo to the right drive but editing /etc/lilo.conf :
boot = /dev/md1
and make sure LILO knows about the mirroring of the /boot partitions by adding the line:
raid-extra-boot = mbr-only
Then, LILO must be reinstalled to the Master Boot Record while the /boot partition is mounted on the root partition. From a system rescue CD, with a properly edited lilo.conf file this will look something like this:
# mount /dev/md0 /mnt
# mount /dev/md1 /mnt/boot
# /mnt/sbin/lilo -C /mnt/etc/lilo.conf
… and reboot.
Experience and thoughts:
I’ve been following my own advice for the last couple of weeks. The system is stable and best of all, *fast*. May those not be “famous last words”, but I’ll update this post as I go. The only thing we all really need is comments and input. If you use something else that works faster for you – let us know. If something downgraded your stability to the level of Win98, please let us know. More importantly – if you see any errors, you got it – let us know.
Test this interesting post about Aligning Partitions
Test BTRFS on 2 drives without RAID/LVM